Home » Jaguar Shows A Teaser Image Of A New Car In Hopes We’ll Forget About Their Awful Rebranding

Jaguar Shows A Teaser Image Of A New Car In Hopes We’ll Forget About Their Awful Rebranding

Jagtease Top
ADVERTISEMENT

I’m sure you’re probably sick by now of people being affronted and baffled by Jaguar’s confusing re-branding and new logo. That’s understandable. Things have been very out of the ordinary since yesterday, mostly because everyone has been talking about Jaguar, which is not something that the general population has done for quite some time. It feels a little weird, but you know what? Not so bad! After yesterday, I’m not sure I have a lot of confidence in what Jaguar is doing, but I suspect whatever it is, it won’t be boring. And these first teaser images of what seems to be their all-new EV seem to support that idea.

Say what you will about what Jaguar is doing, as I myself did, but I do think whatever Jaguar does now, it needs to be so big and crazy that everyone has to pay attention. It may fail, sure, but better to go out with a bang than a gasp and a drool, I say.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

So, with that in mind, let’s take a look at this rear quarter of a car that Jaguar decided to share with us:

Huh. That’s interesting, isn’t it. I believe we’re looking at the rear of the car, which is, notably, window-less. There’s a massive grille that looks a lot like an office’s HVAC grille, the sort of thing you’d see among the acoustical tile on a ceiling, and next to that what seems to be a rear fender.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a mix of sharp angles and more flowing curves, but almost nothing here feels like what we’ve known of Jaguar’s design language before.

 

I wanted to make an extrapolated image of the full rear of the car from this shot, so I gave it ago, using that one image they posted and a lot of guessing:

Jagtease Ig 1

I added that Jaguar leaper there because that grille looked a lot like the sample image of the leaper they released yesterday:

ADVERTISEMENT

Newleaper

Oh man, can that be right? The proportions are so bonkers! But that’s pretty much what the teaser image is showing? Just for fun, I also made a version with less exaggerated proportions, height-wise, just to see what something lower and sportier could look like:

Jagtease Full1

I think I like that better, but hat doesn’t change the fact that the actual image they showed is much, much taller. Here, I’ll show you again, this time from Jag’s Instagram feed:

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Jaguar (@jaguar)

ADVERTISEMENT

Of course, I guessed at the taillights and lower bumper areas. Just for fun, I thought maybe Jaguar would consider doing a special Heritage Edition, where they would use taillights from an old E-Type and a third brake light from a Pep Boys catalog:

Jagteaseig 2

Yeah, now that I like! Let’s see it in the likely never-to-exist sleeker version:

Jagtease Full2

I suspect the actual car may be a bit wider than what I’ve shown here, but, really, I have no idea what they’re planning. It looks oddly brutalist and modern, strangely industrial but perhaps a bit sleek, too? Who the hell knows.

ADVERTISEMENT

I’ll just have to wait for Art Basel to see, like everyone else. This time I need to get there earlier, because someone ate the banana I had set aside for my lunch last time I was there.

 

Relatedbar

Jaguar Changed Their Logo And No One Is Happy

This Is The Car That’s Supposed To Save Jaguar

Why Cars Get Facelifted And Why Some Are More Successful Than Others

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
30 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Philip Dunlop
Philip Dunlop
41 minutes ago

Y’know… I don’t mind it. I’ve come to reappraise this re-launch. And yeah, there are elements I don’t like, but it’s succeeded in generating a lot of buzz (and it seems to be pissing off a lot of the right people online). This teaser is also successful. It’s got us asking the question. I’m happy to reserve judgement until the car is fully revealed.

Frederick Tanujaya
Frederick Tanujaya
1 hour ago

I’ve never seen this level of a fuck-up, congratulations to Jag!

Anders
Anders
2 hours ago

I’m betting the lights are hidden within the grille/horizontal bars, but the teaser looks more like the front of a truck. A competitor to the Tesla Semi ;)?

Robn
Robn
2 hours ago

Oh good, a Jaguar CrossfirE-Type.

Jakob K's Garage
Jakob K's Garage
3 hours ago

But please please please don’t call it the E-Type, JaGUar!

That would also be a copy of something, which would be against their silly branding words the other day, so they can’t do that ,-)

Dimitar
Dimitar
3 hours ago

You can clearly see the tire there very close to the DLO so your SUV proportioned mock-ups don’t make sense. Also it will be wider because the roof center line is off the picture. This is something very low slung, looks promising. From the camo mule pics we know there’s a sedan coming so I believe it makes sense to reveal a concept of it as an ultimate expression of their future language and proportions.
No designer wants to do an SUV, if you’re relaunching such a styling led brand you wanna wow with extreme proportions and I hope that’s what it is.

Last edited 3 hours ago by Dimitar
Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
4 hours ago

Is it rear engined? I thought they weren’t doing engines anymore

Al Camino
Al Camino
6 hours ago

Does this company that replaced Jaguar have actual human designers or are they just using AI? Looks like the latter.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
6 hours ago

I think it’s cropped so that it does not include the center so the 8 foot high dorsal fin will be more of a surprise when they show the real car.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
6 hours ago

I don’t know, are you sure that’s not supposed to be the front? Have you seen the front of a Lexus recently?

Maymar
Maymar
6 hours ago

Fewer windows is good for discretion when getting handjobs from your preference of beautiful person you barely know, maybe they know what they’re doing with this?

The Mark
The Mark
7 hours ago

This is all just so exhausting. But they wanted attention, and they got it.

A. Barth
A. Barth
7 hours ago

It kind of looks like a reverse McLaren F1: two people in the front and one in the back.

Dan Roth
Dan Roth
7 hours ago

Y’all – concepts are…conceptual.

I don’t like the teaser video and its moapy people or threadbare, copied “edginess” but we really did take the bait so hard.

What they show at Art Basel is likely to be the most extreme distillation of their idea for the future, so if it doesn’t have windows, that doesn’t mean the production car won’t have windows.

I honestly feel trolled now. We were supposed to hate their thing and go nuts about it. Lookit them being masters of earned media and organic reach.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
7 hours ago

Can the at LEAST bring the hood ornament back? 😛

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
7 hours ago
Reply to  Dogisbadob

Quite right, a shit kabob needs a handle.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
7 hours ago

Stick a fork in JaGUar.

FlavouredMilk
FlavouredMilk
7 hours ago

So they rebrand their logo to be all circles and then show a car that’s all squares?

Did they forget their meds? I’m not following.

Hoonicus
Hoonicus
8 hours ago

Darth Digestion, Continence, and Congruous got together and said F sublime curves, that Cybertruck has it going on.

AlterId
AlterId
7 hours ago
Reply to  Hoonicus

Apparently Darth Ept was responsible for the design, and unfortunately Darth Dolence couldn’t be bothered to review it before it was released.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
8 hours ago

Yeah. Not buying it. Both figuratively and literally.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
8 hours ago

Rebranding or reblanding? You decide.

EmotionalSupportBMW
EmotionalSupportBMW
8 hours ago

Finally we can answer man’s greatest question: What if a Chrysler Crossfire and the an industrial air conditioner conceived in an episode of Miami Vice. By “copy nothing”, they meant “head on down to Lowe’s and copy whatever Kenmore is doing”. Can I microwave my lunch in this? I.M Pei thinks this is a little too much. Is The Future a mistake? Jaguar wants you to pine for the days when transportation was a horse. A six inch layer of shit covering all of London would be an upgrade to staring at this tragedy of Bauhaus movement. Thank God it doesn’t have windows, otherwise people might see you driving it.

Dodsworth
Dodsworth
8 hours ago

I agree. Chrysler Crossfire with a storm drain.

Arch Duke Maxyenko
Arch Duke Maxyenko
7 hours ago
Reply to  Dodsworth

We all float down here

The Mark
The Mark
7 hours ago

Don’t you want your balloon? Don’t you want it?

Ottomottopean
Ottomottopean
6 hours ago

Came looking to see if I wasn’t alone in seeing a Crossfire. Mission accomplished.

Jack Beckman
Jack Beckman
8 hours ago

You know what works reliably, without electricity, for looking out of your vehicle? WINDOWS. No rear window? That’s insane. Cameras don’t give depth the way a mirror does, Also, some of us get motion sickness using rear-view cameras. Do we really need electronics for electronics’ sake? For EVs, manufacturers make weird looking wheels and squeeze every slippery bit of the shape to save power, then add all kinds of silly light-up logos and other useless electronics. Isn’t that counter-productive? Shouldn’t you be looking to maximize power by NOT adding electronics where they aren’t needed?

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
8 hours ago

This is not promising.

Chris Stevenson
Chris Stevenson
8 hours ago

Looks like a Ford concept from the late 90s, a GT-90 with all right angles instead of triangles.

30
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x