Home » Uncommon Classic Convertibles: 1962 International Scout vs 1976 MG Midget

Uncommon Classic Convertibles: 1962 International Scout vs 1976 MG Midget

Sbsd 5 28 2024
ADVERTISEMENT

Good morning! For today’s Shitbox Showdown, we’re looking at a couple of open-air fun machines. They’re probably not the sort of thing you want to drive every day, but either one would make a fantastic weekend toy. And they’re not the same old thing you see everywhere, either.

But before we do that, let’s see where you ended up with yesterday’s Hawaii trucks. Lots of you worried about the inoperative air conditioning in the GMC, which may have been a factor in giving the Toyota its easy win. I doubt the AC is a difficult fix, but then, I’m the sort of person who will tear apart anything to fix it – including air conditioning – so I’m hardly a judge of what others consider “difficult.”

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

All things being equal, I’d take a GMT800 over a Tacoma any day of the week. But these two are not really equal; the GMC is a 2WD with a standard cab and an automatic, while the Tacoma is a stickshift 4×4 with an extended cab. 4WD and a manual are nice, but that extended cab makes it way more useful as an only vehicle, as it’s likely to be, so I’d take this Tacoma over this GMT800. But only just.

Screenshot From 2024 05 28 17 27 38

So now it’s time to look at a couple more convertibles. Well, really one true convertible, and one sports-utility vehicle with a removable roof. But the end result is the same: Sunshine and fresh air, in forms you don’t see all that often. Let’s see which way you’d rather get there.

ADVERTISEMENT

1962 International Harvester Scout 80 – $5,000

00t0t 5alq8a1h4tn 0t20ci 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 152 cubic inch overhead valve inline 4, three-speed manual, part-time 4WD

Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Odometer reading: unknown

Operational status: Runs and drives, but has been sitting

ADVERTISEMENT

If you think about it, the SUV craze really started when World War II ended, when thousands and thousands of soldiers returned home and discovered that their beloved wartime buddy – the Jeep – was every bit as useful on the farm as it was on the battlefield. Other automakers took notice and started designing their own Jeep competitors, often improving on the formula. International Harvester, already well-known to farmers, entered the fray in 1961 with the Scout, first as a pickup, and later with a full-length roof. In either case, however, you could remove the roof and fold down the windshield for the same open-air experience as a Jeep.

00c0c Fmsfzvikqm3 0ci0t2 1200x900

The standard engine in the Scout, for all nineteen years of its production, was a 152 cubic inch pushrod four, but an unusual one. It’s one-half of International’s V8, literally. They just lopped off one bank of cylinders and one head and called it a day, leaving the remaining cylinder head canted over at 45 degrees from vertical. It’s an incredibly durable, if not terribly powerful, engine. This one powers either the rear axle or both through a three-speed manual gearbox.

00t0t 4t56amczx5c 0t20ci 1200x900

It runs and drives, according to the seller, but it has been sitting around for many years, so you know the drill – change the fluids, replace everything made of rubber, go through the brakes, all that good stuff. But being able to hop in and turn the key and fire it up is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT

00e0e 8szg9ttqzgu 0t20ci 1200x900

The seller describes it as “partially restored,” but to me it looks pretty good. It’s a truck; it’s not supposed to be pristine. You can keep your six-figure Broncos and the like. I’d rather have this old “Binder” with slightly mismatched body panels and no rear bumper.

1976 MG Midget 1500 – $4,195

01717 Nuqt1kgcou 0ci0po 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 1.5 liter overhead valve inline 4, four-speed manual, RWD

Location: Columbus, OH

ADVERTISEMENT

Odometer reading: 37,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

Time for a quick history lesson, if I may: The “Midget” name was first used on pre-war MG sports cars, way back in 1929 with the introduction of the M Type. The name stuck around all the way up to 1955, through the J, P, and T series cars, though the post-war TC through TF cars are not often referred to as Midgets. The name was officially revived in 1961 for a badge-engineered Austin-Healey Sprite, which was produced for nineteen years – coincidentally, the same nineteen years as the International Scout.

00k0k Ifvbmidwmib 0ci0po 1200x900

The Midget progressed through four generations during that time; this is the final generation, equipped with a 1493 cc four-cylinder engine from fellow British Leyland marque (and rival) Triumph. It’s the same engine used in Triumph’s Spitfire. The Midget 1500, as the Mark IV cars are usually called, had been saddled with the same big black rubber bumpers as its big sister the MGB, but this one has been “back-dated” with earlier chrome bumpers. This is an easy and popular mod for later Midgets, and it really is an improvement. The rubber front bumper makes the Midget look like a stoned frog with an underbite.

ADVERTISEMENT

00h0h 1lj258if8gu 0ci0nx 1200x900

That’s not the only improvement that has been made to this car. It also features a really nice aftermarket steering wheel, an electric radiator fan, and a Weber DGV downdraft carb conversion. It all works, it all runs well, and the seller says they have put a lot of time and money into this car to put it in good running order. The only reason they’re selling it is that they’re moving, and can’t take it with them. (Well, not with that attitude, you can’t…)

00707 6st0latnic7 0ci0po 1200x900

Not all is well, though: The seller also notes that this car has a fair amount of rust. The non-original British racing green paint is also substandard, though it does look all right from a distance. The number roundels are a nice touch. My advice is to just drive it and enjoy it, and don’t sweat the cosmetics too much.

We’re big fans of open-air motoring around here, whether on or off the pavement. But there’s no reason to limit your options to the common choices, your Wranglers and Miatas and the like. These two, by virtue of being a little more obscure, are relative bargains. Neither one is perfect, but either one could be perfect for you. Which will it be?

ADVERTISEMENT

(Image credits: Craigslist sellers)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
66 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
The Stig's Misanthropic Cousin
The Stig's Misanthropic Cousin
5 months ago

I’m going with the MG, at least in a hypothetical world where I can fit in the damn thing. After reading the original ad, I’m not concerned about the rust. Seller notes a patch panel in one of the floors and a door that sags slightly when opened. I don’t see a reason to believe this car has structural rust or isn’t safe to drive (at least compared to one of these in perfect condition). I’m also not concerned about the paint. Cars in this price range have flaws. This car looks like a solid 20 footer. Assuming it runs as well as the seller claims, this sounds like a good purchase at this price.

Cyko9
Cyko9
5 months ago

I went back and forth a few times, but the MG got my vote. It’d be fun to drive, though I’d ditch the roundels – I’m not racing it. Not sure I’d be up for the long-term maintenance of one, though. On the flip-side, the Scout would be a little easier to work on and keep running, but the body style isn’t speaking to me, especially with the top off.

Racingtown
Racingtown
5 months ago

That midget looks pretty nice, but there is no way I’ll fit in it, so Scout it is this time.

Crisis
Crisis
5 months ago

There are no wrong answers today. Both would be fun, relatively cheap toys. All comes down to which one speaks to you. I voted Scout simply because it’s less common.

EastbayLoc
EastbayLoc
5 months ago

I was thinking I was going MG until the next to last paragraph. A fair amount of rust? Bummer. I’ve spent a lot of time in both of these cars. A friend who happened to be 6’6″ had one and would look over the windshield to drive. These were a lot of fun and easy to wrench on.

Another friend in college had a Scout and used it as his dive car. We would load it with gear and head up the coast to a beach we would put our gear on and walk in from the beach. It broke down a time or two and left us stranded and we didn’t take the roof off too much. I recall it was crazy heavy even for 3 of us to remove. Today I vote yellow scout.

Gubbin
Gubbin
5 months ago

MG please. Frivolity over utility.

Arrest-me Red
Arrest-me Red
5 months ago

While it screams unsafe, the Scout always fascinated me.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
5 months ago
Reply to  Arrest-me Red

That’s not the Scout doing the screaming, it’s your passengers.

Arrest-me Red
Arrest-me Red
5 months ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

Good point, I tend to tune them out. 🙂

StillNotATony
StillNotATony
5 months ago
Reply to  Arrest-me Red

Wait…

It’s the SCOUT that’s unsafe? NOT the car approximately the same size and with the same structural integrity as a styrofoan egg carton?

Arrest-me Red
Arrest-me Red
5 months ago
Reply to  StillNotATony

The Scout is unsafe is a different way. All metal, no restraints. In an accident you can hose out the interior for the next victim…I mean owner.

MATTinMKE
MATTinMKE
5 months ago

I’m all about new automotive experiences lately, and I’ve previously owned a TR6 and an MGB. Voted Scout because it’s different. Also because backwards facing rear seat!

PaysOutAllNight
PaysOutAllNight
5 months ago
Reply to  MATTinMKE

Backwards facing rear seat is nothing compared to that mid-ship mounted spare tire!

(Imagines a manager stopping in on an engineering meeting: “Hey, Phil, where’s the safest place we can keep the spare tire? God forbid an owner gets stranded out there somewhere!”)

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
5 months ago

Both are holdovers from the original Scouts that were pickups. They didn’t bother removing the bulkhead between the cab and bed when they put a stretch roof on the wagon Scouts.

PaysOutAllNight
PaysOutAllNight
5 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

True, but not how I imagine it went down. 😉

Cheats McCheats
Cheats McCheats
5 months ago

I would definitely take both!

Aaron
Aaron
5 months ago

Both are drivers, for sure. But the sitting/lack of mileage on the Scout is concerning. I’ll take my chances with the rust on the MG. With all the standard resto-upgrades done, anything short of major structural repair makes the MG a smarter buy unless you’re a total offroad head.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
5 months ago

I think they prefer to be called MG Little People nowadays. But that’s the one I’d take. Rust just adds character.
I’d also ditch the Weber and put on a pair of SUs. That downdraft manifold is a torque-killer.

Angry Bob
Angry Bob
5 months ago
Reply to  Rad Barchetta

Microsquirt EFI.

Farty McSprinkles
Farty McSprinkles
5 months ago

I have always liked these MGs and the level of detail that the owner provided makes me think it probably is what it seems. I would just drive and enjoy it. If the frame were rusty, I would rethink that approach.

Brandon Forbes
Brandon Forbes
5 months ago

I feel like I should click the MG ad to learn more about the rust before clicking that button, but at the end of the day I’m not actually buying it, so I just don’t care. I have no desire for a big 4×4, or a small one or whatever this is, it’s cool but not for me, so easy win for the MG in my book. Especially in BRG!

StillNotATony
StillNotATony
5 months ago

Seeing as yellow is objectively the best color for pretty much any vehicle, this is an easy choice. Scout (slowly, but inexorably) FTW!!

MEK
MEK
5 months ago

Personally I’d enjoy the MG more, but the price on the Scout is going nowhere but up. Buy it, fix it up, drive it around and in 5 years sell it for twice as much as you paid for it. Close call but Scout it is.

Last edited 5 months ago by MEK
WR250R
WR250R
5 months ago

The later Scout II’s are the ones to have. But still, Scout!

Geoff Buchholz
Geoff Buchholz
5 months ago

That Midget is cute, and in the right colour (spelling intentional), but I’d make it look like a Power Wheels toy. Scout it is, before VW’s relaunch drives up the price any more.

ProfessorOfUselessFacts
ProfessorOfUselessFacts
5 months ago

I have a buddy who restores scouts for a living. This one doesn’t look to need much, but it’s always good to have a friend when taking on someone else’s partially done project.

ESO
ESO
5 months ago

Any chance you could provide contact info. for your buddy? “Asking for a friend”, please don’t tell my wife, that sort of thing…

MY LEG!
MY LEG!
5 months ago

I can toodle around town in a Midget. But it’s English. But it’s also green… Midget.

Scoutdude
Scoutdude
5 months ago

Do you really have to ask? Now I’m more into II’s but I’d do an 80 over a Fidget any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Church
Church
5 months ago

I’ve owned too many Scouts. Never again.

Nic Periton
Nic Periton
5 months ago
Reply to  Church

I’ve owned too many Midgets. And If you are going to the trouble to de-impact bumper one, please, do the suspension fix as well.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
5 months ago

Slow and nimble versus slow and able. Going with versatility today: Scout.

3WiperB
3WiperB
5 months ago

That seems super cheap for that Scout. My sister has one and it seems to be broken about 3/4 of the year. Great price, but they are really tough to make dependable. The MG is an OK price but will probably be much more dependable if you like to drive your classic. For the price I’d probably live with the Scout breaking down on me for a while.

Scoutdude
Scoutdude
5 months ago
Reply to  3WiperB

Yeah the Scout is going to be much easier to make and keep reliable as a lot of the parts are still on the shelf at your FLAPS since so much of it was purchased rather than made in house. What other 60 year old vehicle has taillight lens you can purchase at NAPA?

3WiperB
3WiperB
5 months ago
Reply to  Scoutdude

Both have great parts availability for cheap prices. Hopefully that doesn’t change for the MG crowd with Moss buying Victoria British a few years back and now Moss being merged with Rimmer Bros and both having been bought by private equity.

Last edited 5 months ago by 3WiperB
Trust Doesn't Rust
Trust Doesn't Rust
5 months ago

I almost bought a Midget about 15 years ago. I wound up getting a divorce instead.

Elhigh
Elhigh
5 months ago

An unmolested Scout for less than five figures? And it doesn’t come in boxes? SOLD.

Seriously, I intend to own a Scout at some point in my life and five grand is “forgiveable dalliance” money.

Richard O
Richard O
5 months ago
Reply to  Elhigh

If I had a place to put it, I’d be driving down to Colorado Springs from Denver to take a look.

1 2 3
66
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x