Good morning! Today’s musical-and-automotive tour stops at 1988, with a pair of low-mileage two-doors and a New York City band known for heavy riffs, social commentary, and a little bit of yellow Spandex. Get ready to damage your speakers and open your mind with Living Colour’s 1988 debut album, Vivid.
But first, let’s finish up with yesterday’s matchup, also featuring two coupes. I’m not sure what I was expecting with these two, honestly; I like them both and would be happy to find either one of them in my garage, but I think I have to give a slight edge to the Storm, just because it’s the one that got away, and because of the color. I mean, how often do you get a chance at a magenta car?
You all went the other way, however, and picked the more expensive Probe, despite its cosmetic deficiencies. The siren song of that Mazda V6 is hard to deny, I admit. Quite a few of you thought it was “overpriced,” but that’s subjective. A car is worth exactly what someone is willing to pay for it at the moment of its sale, and not one penny more or less. If this car sells, it wasn’t overpriced.
In the summer of 1988, a song called “Cult Of Personality” appeared on MTV, and I was mesmerized. I didn’t know what to make of it. It was four African-American musicians, playing metal, but not metal like I was used to. This was more complicated, more melodic, with a little jazz thrown in, along with some stuff I couldn’t categorize. But was it meant for me? I couldn’t tell. I listened to a little bit of rap and hip-hop, but I felt like an outsider when I did, like I was trespassing on music that wasn’t mine. It wasn’t until later that I realized that, yes, I was supposed to listen to it, but also to take the time to understand it.
I was hooked. I bought Vivid on cassette that summer and it pretty much lived in the Blaupunkt tape deck of my VW Scirocco during my junior year of high school. And to my delight, the rest of the songs on it were just as good, if not better, and dealt with some themes I wasn’t familiar with: race relations, poverty, drug addiction, and gentrification. “Glamour Boys” gave me a laugh, because it seemed to be written about half of the guys at my school, the ones I couldn’t stand. And I’ll admit that it was several years later that I found out that my favorite track, “Memories Can’t Wait,” is actually a Talking Heads cover. I still like the Living Colour version better. I got some funny looks – a skinny long-haired white kid blasting weird hard rock with Public Enemy on one track – but I also converted some of my friends. And maybe the only thing better than finding new music that instantly hooks you is sharing it with your friends and having them go “Yeah!”
So now, we turn our attention to a couple of cars that have nothing at all to do with any of that, except hailing from the same year. Let’s take a look.
1988 Nissan 300ZX 2+2 – $6,995
Engine/drivetrain: 3.0-liter overhead can V6, four-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Norfolk, VA
Odometer reading: 88,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
It can’t be easy for an automaker to have an icon. It’s a big burden to carry, especially if it was the original version of something that attained the iconic status in the first place: think Beetle, Mustang, Viper, and so on. You have to update the design eventually; you can’t just keep building the same thing for decades any more (unless you’re Lada). But get it wrong, and you’ll hear about it; iconic status is as easy to lose as it is hard to gain. Nissan’s original Z car, introduced in 1969, is an icon. So, too, is its 1990s twin-turbocharged monster. But the models in between tend to get forgotten, especially the less-desirable versions like this automatic-equipped, long-wheelbase 2+2 300ZX.
The 300ZX marked the switch from inline 6s to V6s for the Z car. The VG30E V6 is a solid engine, though not exactly a fire-breather in non-turbo form like this. If you want a “fast” Z car, look elsewhere; this one is a cruiser. It has very low miles, only 88,000, and the seller says it “starts right up.” We don’t get a lot more information about its mechanical condition, other than that the air conditioning works.
It looks pretty clean, as you would expect for such a low-mileage car. I do wonder if those seats have been replaced, though – did Nissan really put gray and blue seats in a red car? I like it, even where the blue is fading to purple, but it seems like an odd choice. That leather-wrapped three-spoke steering wheel looks really familiar to me; I pulled one just like it out of a 300ZX in a junkyard to install on our old Pathfinder. This one needs the cheesy Pep Boys cover taken off it.
Outside, it has a few clearcoat issues, and some faded paint and trim, but overall it still looks sharp. I personally prefer these later facelifted 300ZXs to the earlier models; I think the design looks better with a few softer lines. And it has T-tops! Hopefully they don’t leak.
1988 Buick Reatta – $5,700
Engine/drivetrain: 3.8-liter overhead valve V6, four-speed automatic, FWD
Location: Staten Island, NY
Odometer reading: 33,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Throughout most of the 1970s and 80s, the cars of GM’s four mainstream divisions – Chevrolet, Buick, Oldsmobile, and Pontiac – were very similar, with only minor trim differences in some cases to tell them apart. In many cases, even Cadillacs were the same as the “lesser” brands, at least under the skin. But each division also had, at various times, a “halo” car, a vehicle all its own, something you couldn’t get at any other dealership. For Buick, starting in 1988, that car was the Reatta, a two-seat coupe and later convertible.
The Reatta, like other GM specialty cars, is a parts-bin special: It rides on a shortened Riviera platform, which means it has four-wheel independent suspension, Buick’s legendary 3800 V6, and front-wheel-drive. You might think, to look at it, that a manual gearbox option would be a natural, but the Reatta was only ever available with a four-speed automatic. This one, with only 33,000 miles on it, isn’t even broken in – though it may need a few things replaced due to age.
The seller says it does have new tires and brakes, however, so they have done some work to keep it roadworthy. Inside, it’s as clean as you’d hope, and appears to have a fully-functional touchscreen. Space-age stuff for 1988, and it’s impressive to see one intact and working all these years later.
Outside, it’s clean, straight, shiny… and for some unknown reason, has a giant non-functional aftermarket hood scoop stuck on it, like a zit on the prom queen’s nose. And they went to all the trouble of paint-matching the damn thing, too, which somehow actually makes it worse. The Reatta is such a clean, sleek design; why gum it up with some tacky shit like this? With any luck, it’s just stuck on, but I fear someone drilled mounting holes.
Neither one of these cars is a speed demon or a canyon-carver. But sometimes it’s nice to just lay back and cruise, and these will do that just fine. And you can virtually guarantee you won’t see another car like yours at a typical car gathering in either case. So what’ll it be – the awkward version of the Japanese coupe, or the one-off American two-seater with one tacky modification?
(Image credits: Craigslist sellers)
Given they are both automatic I am going to go with the Buick. It’s weird enough that if it’s truly as good as it looks in the pictures, it’ll grab attention in a way I don’t think the Z will. Also, probably my least favorite Z generation.
And now some Living Colour related musings – a groundbreaking band that I adore and still listen to on the regular. One thing I’ve not figured out is how much infamous Washington D.C. punk band Bad Brains (also notable for being an African-American band in a very white genre) influenced Living Colour or vice versa. If you listen to Bad Brains from 1986 like Riot Master, Re-ignition, and Sacred Love (vocals recorded over a pay phone from jail!) you’ll hear a proto- Living Colour sound. Then you hear tracks like With the Quickness and Voyage into Infinity which came out in 1989 after Vivid and sound similar and Soul Craft, which came out around 1990 and resembles some of the harder-edged sound of Stain and Collideoscope.
Bad Brains were a major influence on Living Colour, as stated by Vernon Reid on many occasions. I luv both bands.
A few commentors mention the CRT and challenges with sourcing parts/repairs.
https://www.theautopian.com/gms-futuristic-80s-digital-displays-are-dying-but-this-man-is-fighting-to-keep-them-alive/
3.0-liter overhead cans are what I see when I look up at my wife.
First off: Mark, you deserve to have “Cult of Personality” sang by Puddles Pity Party. How come you haven’t heard him? Go youtubeing him. You’re welcome.
Second: France.
Third: I love Reattas for some reason I don’t fully understand. This one looks great. If the ZX was a manual I might think about it. As it is, Buick. Thanks.
For a long time I have had an unhealthy fascination with Reattas so this was a super easy choice. The example in question looks quite nice, and I’ll forgive the stupidity with the hood scoop.
On the other hand, the only Z that ever really floated my boat was the original 240Z. The only one less desirable to me than the particular Z31 shown is a 280ZX 2+2 for how Nissan bloated and bastardized a beautiful original – much as Jaguar did with the E-type.
I was set to vote for the Z and I actually like the 2+2 versions but I just can’t wrap around my head about having one of these matching the truck-like VG30E with an auto (the same way a contemporary Supra with an Auto just wouldn’t do it for me).
Then I saw the Reatta and the low milleage and mint interior sealed the deal. It’s pretty much a time capsule. The hood scoop needs to go, though.
Reatta is a much better looking car, and it’s not like it’s any less sporty than a non-turbo Z31 with a slushbox.
Oh, it’s even more sporty because it has that hood scoop. 🙂
I came in for the Z but left the prom with the Reatta.
Dammit! I didn’t read yesterday’s showdown! I missed out in adding my contributions to the probe jokes! Although that is more of a Grey thing…
This was a hard choice, and I’m a big Reatta fan (for unknown reasons) but in the end I went for the Z. It’s the one I can imagine being in with the T-tops off and Tesla on the stereo, going somewhere without a schedule
Although I like the Z’s interior much better, the prospect of driving an automatic 2+2 Z-car triggers my shame reflex in a way the Reatta doesn’t. For my money, I’ll go Buick and get rid of that scoop somehow.
Nissan today for the win.
Living Colour was an opening act for The Rolling Stones Steel Wheels Tour in 1984.
Saw them on that tour. They played huge arenas and for the show I saw, Living Color’s sound system was not up to the task. That made me sad as I really liked that band.
You are right. Saw them at the Super Dome in New Orleans. The sound was not good at all.
And it was 1988 or 89, not 1984. Brain Fart.
I gotta Reatta!
A friend of mine had an ’85 300ZX in high school. I can’t not vote for it.
I admit it’s not rational, but I’ll almost always pick a Z that shows up on the showdown.
Definitely “both” for me! I loved both of these when they came out (yes, even the 2+2 body style ZX). But if I have to choose, I’ll take the Reatta. More unique car and this one is in great condition (even with the scoop).
You are KILLING it with the music tie-ins…Living Colour and Vernon Reid were next level for 12 year old guitar playing me, rewiring some part of my brain that was trapped in pentatonic blues scale hell. So many doors opened by Vivid. Thanks for the flashback.
Oh, and Reatta by a mile.
IDK, the hood scoop is kind of doing it for me on the Reatta. If it was slightly more angular, I think it would look kind of boss
I just can’t with the 2+2 Z31s. It looks like it’s wearing a fanny pack.
If it was a 2-seat manual, this wouldn’t be a question. Loved my 85 NA.
That era of Z is already a hard sell. The slushbox just puts the final nail in the coffin.
The Reatta has that super cool touchscreen, so I’ll rock the RadWood special today.
Reatta.
As much as I love the S30 and Z31, I despise the Z31 facelift. The 1983-1986 Z31 looks so much better because the car owns the nose overhang and doesn’t have a weird squashed ass with tiny taillights. The 2+2 variant with the hunchback stance just makes the weird squashed ass even more apparent.
The Reatta’s weird all over, but it’s meant to be. The ungainly proportions are just part of the car’s odd charm. Plus, assuming neither car’s had anything but the head units replaced, the Reatta should have the better stereo since it comes straight from the Toronado. And it’s got a VFD screen. When’s the last time you saw VFD anything?
I remember when I was a little kid (think mid 80’s) and my Uncle bought a 300ZX for my Aunt as a “surprise”. She was not amused. Fast forward a couple of years and my cousin is old enough to drive. The whole family (aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents – 20 of us total) rented a cabin on Lake Michigan. 20 people don’t fit in one car, so there was a caravan, and my cousin and I ended up in the Z. This is where I was introduced to Led Zeppelin, ZZ Top, and Van Halen. We got hungry along the way, and stopped at Taco Bell. At the time, they were pushing a 10 pack of tacos, so we got that and pressed on. Taco detritus everywhere, and once again, Auntie was not amused.
Voted Buick, mostly because of the condition & color.
Having owned a red 2 seat manual 86 300ZX, I’ll have to go with the Reatta, since the downgrade to a 2+2 automatic would be too tragic.
The Reatta is in nice condition, and I’m impressed when I see one around, but I’m a Z fan. This one is in pretty good shape, too. The turbo might be more impressive, but it’s got some maintenance headaches. I’d prefer black or silver, but the faded red is still all right. Good thing Virginia is far away for me. A little cheaper and I’d be pricing tickets.